Transparency and clarity in creating our programme is very important to us. Our programme commitee are experts, community leaders, and speakers, some of whom have been part of re:publica for many years. They help us judge submitted session to ensure a broad range of perspectives and voices.
The programme commitee receive Call for Participation submissions within their own areas of expertise. Submissions are forwarded anonymously, guaranteeing that content will remain the primary selection criterion.
As we like to encourage our programme commitee to take part in our Call for Participation, submission assignments are closely monitored to avoid bias. The programme commitee evaluate proposed sessions and write a review. Our programme team takes their assessments and reviews into account, but will always have the last word in selecting and curating the programme.